Skip to main content

CyberKnife case review

Is CyberKnife relevant for your case?

A decision cannot be made from the diagnosis name alone. The review considers location, size, treatment history, and your imaging. This page explains how records are reviewed and what to prepare.

Record review pathway: upload, navigator, and review

What happens after you submit

These five steps are the workflow recorded in the provider record. TanyaKanker prepares and forwards the records; clinical decisions remain with the provider team.

  1. Upload medical history and records privately

    You send the records you already have. The upload is private and used only to assess completeness.

  2. TanyaKanker prepares a PatientCase and checks completeness

    The records are organized into a case summary and checked for completeness before they are forwarded.

  3. The access team sends a summary for specialist review

    The summary is sent for specialist review when that is necessary for your access goal.

  4. The hospital confirms options, document needs, and cost estimate

    The facility determines treatment options, additional documents, and a cost estimate. That is the provider's decision, not TanyaKanker's.

  5. If the patient chooses to continue, the team helps with appointment, visa, and travel

    Only if you choose to proceed: assistance with scheduling, travel documents, and the visit.

Provider review is required. There is no automatic answer, and no decision can be made from the diagnosis name alone.

See source separation

Source separation

  • According to Foshan CyberKnife Center materials

    The workflow steps on this page are the provider's recorded access pathway. Provider marketing claims are not independent medical evidence, and no outcome claim is taken from them.

  • TanyaKanker explanation

    The document list and assessment factors come from TanyaKanker's content module, not provider marketing material.

This page makes no statement about treatment outcomes, the superiority of a method, or case acceptance.

What the team needs to consider

These factors help determine why one case can be discussed while another cannot. There is no automated score behind the list; the output is always a review, not a number.

  • Tumor location

    How close it is to organs or tissue that must be protected.

  • Tumor size

    Size affects whether focused irradiation can be planned.

  • Number of lesions

    One lesion or several; the number changes the treatment consideration.

  • Prior radiotherapy

    Site, date, dose, and fraction count if any.

  • Nearby critical organs

    Structures that limit the maximum dose that can be delivered.

  • Motion and breathing

    Moving targets change how tracking is used.

  • Functional status

    General condition affects treatment choice.

  • Treatment goal

    Local control, symptom relief, or another agreed goal.

What to submit

The more complete and readable the imaging, the further a case can be discussed.

  • Most recent CT / MRI / PET-CT

    Include DICOM when available; this is often the most important file.

  • Radiology report

    The official reading for the imaging above.

  • Pathology result

    Tumor type and grade when a biopsy has been done.

  • Prior treatment summary

    Surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy with dates.

  • Prior radiotherapy history

    Site, date, dose, fraction count, and plan if accessible.

  • Molecular / NGS result

    When relevant for later options.

  • Functional status

    If known and recorded by the treating team.

This is an initial list. The facility may request additional records after reviewing your case.

Read the limits of this review

What this page does not provide

  • This is not a diagnosis. Imaging is not interpreted and staging is not determined here.
  • This is not a treatment recommendation or a treatment plan.
  • This does not guarantee that the facility will accept the case. Suitability is assessed by the provider team.
  • No price is promised. A figure appears only in a written provider quote.

A review, not a promise

We help assess whether your case should be discussed further. We do not promise acceptance, scheduling, treatment outcomes, or a particular price.

This information is not a diagnosis or a medical recommendation. Decisions remain with your medical team.

When CyberKnife may not be suitable

This list is not an assessment of your case. It explains situations in which focused therapy may not be the main consideration, so no one waits for an answer that this pathway cannot provide.

  • Disease has spread widely so local therapy is no longer the main focus.
  • Tumor size or location means focused dose cannot be delivered safely.
  • Prior radiotherapy to the same area means cumulative dose limits must be calculated.
  • The treatment goal is better answered by another approach, including systemic therapy or surgery.
  • The patient's overall clinical condition makes focused therapy a lower priority.
Open frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

How do I know whether CyberKnife is relevant for my case?

A doctor must review tumor location, size, number of lesions, treatment history, and imaging. Diagnosis name alone is not enough.

What happens after I send records?

Records are organized into a case summary, checked for completeness, and forwarded for review when the access goal requires it. You receive a written answer before deciding.

Next step

Start with the records you already have

We check whether the records are complete and explain the next step. Suitability has not been assessed and is not promised.

Upload records for review

This information is not a diagnosis or a medical recommendation. Decisions remain with your medical team.

Not a diagnosis and not final medical advice. Must be reviewed by a doctor.